![\"kid](\"http:\/\/www.thejuliagroup.com\/blog\/wp-content\/uploads\/2011\/02\/evalolli.jpg\" "\\"The")
<\/a><\/p>\nWhen I tell this to conservative friends, they insist, as they have all my life, that “No, no, we’re not talking about YOUR family, but those OTHER Hispanics that come over here and drop babies just so they can get welfare, WIC and benefit from the American taxpayer while we all do without services.”<\/p>\n
One of my former teammates said,<\/p>\n
“Those stories in the media must be coming from somewhere.”<\/em><\/p>\n I told her, yes, they’re coming from the same place as the stories that our president is a Muslim, Kenyan whose American-born mother for some reason felt the need fifty years ago to place fake birth announcements in the Hawaiian newspapers so that her baby could one day be a U.S. citizen and be president. Oh, wait, children of U.S. citizens ARE citizens, no matter where they are born, like Senator John McCain, who was born in Panama, of U.S. parents.<\/p>\n Having data available from the U.S. Census Bureau, I thought I would interrupt with actual facts. The data come from the American Community Survey, 1% sample of the U.S. To make it easier to analyze, I just downloaded the state of California. If people are coming from Mexico to have babies, I’d think this would be the closest place, rather than say, New Hampshire. So if there really are these hordes of babies being born of mothers who just came for welfare benefits, we should find them here.<\/p>\n The Federation for American Immigration Reform<\/a> says,<\/p>\n An anchor baby is defined as an offspring of an illegal immigrant or other non-citizen, who under current legal interpretation becomes a United States citizen at birth. These children may instantly qualify for welfare and other state and local benefit programs.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n The same site gives examples of hospitals where “over 70% of babies are born to illegal aliens” and expresses concern about “chain migration” where babies when they become 21 years old can sponsor relatives to the U.S. According to the Orwellian-named “Accuracy in Media”<\/a> site the U.S. spends $6 billion a year on Mexican anchor babies.<\/p>\n There are a few parts of this story that need to be checked out:<\/p>\n First number,based on the question “Did you have a baby in the last twelve months?” This question is only asked to women (duh!) who are over 14 years of age and under 50 years of age.<\/p>\n Number of births to all Californians in 2009:\u00a0 531,749<\/strong><\/p>\n Next let’s look at the number of births to Hispanics in California:<\/p>\n Number of births to mothers of Hispanic descent in California in 2009:\u00a0 256,455<\/strong><\/p>\n Of course, most Hispanics are citizens.\u00a0 If your mother is a citizen, you’ll be a U.S. citizen no matter where you are born. It’s in the constitution. So, how many children were born to Hispanic mothers who are not citizens?<\/p>\n Number of births to mothers of Hispanic descent in California in 2009 who are not citizens: 107,811<\/strong><\/p>\n Before you get too excited, you need to realize that if EITHER your father OR your mother is a U.S. citizen, you are a citizen. That is, if your dad’s a citizen, mom doesn’t need to make a trek from Mexico when she’s nine months pregnant. Wherever in the world you are born, you’re a citizen, which is why my oldest brother who was born on an air force base in Japan, is American.\u00a0 For this next step, I had to make an assumption which is that if you are a woman who had a baby and is living with an adult male, he is the father.<\/p>\n What I want to establish is whether the mother or father is a citizen. You could argue that adult male could be HER father. Well, in that case, the mother would be a citizen. If your father (or mother) is a citizen when you are born or\u00a0 becomes a naturalized citizen before you turn 18 years old, bingo, you’re a citizen<\/a>.<\/p>\n Number of births in households to mothers of Hispanic descent where neither parent is a citizen in California in 2009:\u00a0 71,343<\/strong><\/p>\n Lie #1: There are a huge proportion of births to non-citizens First of all, let me point out that the proper term for these children, born in the United States is “U.S. citizens” . <\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n Now, California has approximately28% of the Hispanic population of the country (13.7 million out of the 48.4 million). If the birthrate here is proportional that would mean that the entire country would have 1\/.28 * 71,343 or<\/p>\n Estimated births in 2009 to Hispanic non-citizens = 254,786<\/p>\n The total number of births in 2009 was 4,136,000<\/p>\n Births of children to Hispanic non-citizen parents = 6.2% of births<\/p>\n While the 70% figures given by the inflammatory websites cited above give the impression that a large percentage of babies born in the U.S. are to non-citizens, I guess those were not intended to be taken as factual statements.<\/p>\n Lie #2: Children of non-citizens cost a large percentage of the budget<\/strong><\/p>\n Now, California has approximately28% of the Hispanic population of the country (13.7 million out of the 48.4 million) and 66% of Hispanics are Mexicans. Multiplying out these figures we get\u00a0\u00a0 –\u00a0 168,159<\/p>\n Dividing $6 billion by 168,159 I get $35,680 for each child. Where exactly is that $35,680 coming from? It’s not welfare. The average monthly payment for a single mother with one child in the state of Texas is $225<\/a>. Look it up. In California, a family of three\u00a0 – a mom and two children, receives $750 a month<\/a>. Nationwide, the average is $425 a month.<\/p>\n So, if EVERY child is on welfare\u00a0 the cost is $71,467,575 a year which according to CBS News, is about what the federal government spends in 11 minutes.<\/p>\n Lie #3 : Pregnant women are coming here to have babies just so they can stay in the United States<\/strong><\/p>\n I should point out one fact that checked out from the hate speech websites is the average non-citizen woman giving birth already has a child over age five who is a U.S. citizen. In fact, of those 71,343 mothers who gave birth, the majority already had a child over five who was a U.S. citizen, which presumably means they have lived here over five years.<\/p>\n Number of Hispanic mothers giving birth in families in which this child was the first citizen in the household: 33,915<\/strong><\/p>\n Incidentally, that represents 6.4% of California births, and that includes all Hispanics, not just Mexicans. The only reason I used only Mexicans in the previous analysis is that the claim of $6 billion spent per year referred specifically to children born of Mexican parents.<\/p>\n I did not get to the part yet about the GREAT majority of households in which the parents were working. One reason for that is that there was a lot of missing data on the employment variables I wanted to use.<\/p>\n I could go on more but I have to get back and do some work for actual pay.<\/p>\n FACT CHECKING<\/strong><\/p>\n I compared the percentage of Hispanics in the population estimates from the American Community Survey and the total population of the state of California to the U.S. Census Bureau’s facts on California<\/a> and came up with the identical numbers, 37.0% and 36,961,664.<\/p>\n\n
\n<\/strong><\/p>\n